Future Processing
Editor's pick #1Polish software house with a London office, a UK managing director and a large financial-services client base
Founded 2000 | Gliwice, Poland (London office) | 750–1,000 employees
custom-softwarecloud-devopsdata-ailegacy-modernisationqa-testingdedicated-teams
What is Future Processing?
Future Processing started in Gliwice, Poland in 2000 and now employs roughly 800 people, with a London office at Gracechurch Street led by a UK managing director. Directory data puts around 45% of its work in financial services, with insurance, energy, media and healthcare making up much of the rest. It sells bespoke development, cloud and data work, and consulting. Delivery happens mainly in Poland, which keeps rates in the Central European band.
Future Processing works primarily with clients in Financial services, Insurance, Energy, Media, Healthcare sectors. What sets it apart: Twenty-five years of delivery from Poland with UK-based account leadership in the City.
Future Processing tech stack and services
.NETJavaAzureAWSReactAngularPythonPower BI
| Service area |
|---|
| Custom Software |
| Cloud & DevOps |
| Data & AI |
| Legacy Modernisation |
| QA & Testing |
| Dedicated Teams |
Future Processing pricing
Short answer: Future Processing uses a time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Fixed project | Quoted per project | Well-defined scope |
| Time and materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Future Processing does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Future Processing pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +A London office with a UK managing director means escalations land with someone in your time zone | -No hardware or embedded engineering capability, so connected-device products need a second supplier |
| +Heavy financial-services and insurance exposure suggests familiarity with UK regulated-sector procurement | -Polish engineering rates have risen steadily and are now closer to Western European levels than they were a decade ago |
| +Around 800 staff is large enough to grow a team quickly without the overhead of a 10,000-person vendor | -Public pricing and minimum project sizes are not published |
| +Polish delivery is one hour ahead of the UK, so working days overlap almost completely |
Future Processing vs alternatives
How Future Processing compares to the other top Software Development Outsourcing companies.
| Company | Best for | Main difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | UK product companies, software plus hardware, nearshore rates. | One team can own firmware, electronics, cloud back end and the user-facing app, managed from a London office | 4.7 | Full comparison |
| Endava | Large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at... | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Godel Technologies | UK mid-market firms wanting a UK-run nearshore team. | UK management and contracting with engineers spread across four EU and EU-adjacent countries | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| ELEKS | Data-heavy custom software, Ukrainian rates, mature processes. | Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Amdaris (Insight) | UK firms on Azure, .NET modernisation, Eastern European... | A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Scott Logic | Capital markets and government, UK-only delivery required. | Trading-system and capital-markets engineering from teams based entirely in the UK | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Softwire | UK media and charities, bespoke builds, onshore teams. | Long-standing onshore bespoke development that trains its own graduate engineers | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Large dedicated teams, data and cloud engineering, Ukrainian... | A 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Spyrosoft | Automotive and industrial software, UK-led Polish teams. | Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Equal Experts | Senior engineers for complex delivery, government and retail. | Senior-only teams drawn from a large associate network | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| STX Next | Python back ends and data products, Polish rates. | Deep Python specialism across web back ends, data engineering and machine learning | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Kainos | UK government digital services, Workday programmes. | Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Infinum | Consumer apps where design quality matters. | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Made Tech | UK central and local government buyers. | Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Regulated industries, medical devices, banking. | Swiss engineering discipline in regulated sectors with a UK team of about 150 | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Codurance | Legacy modernisation, engineering-practice improvement. | Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Ciklum | Large dedicated teams with a London contract. | London headquarters with a long history of large dedicated teams in Ukraine and Central Europe | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BJSS (CGI) | NHS and government programmes, large onshore delivery. | Large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| AND Digital | Companies building in-house digital capability. | Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | Big cloud and data programmes, Ukrainian rates at... | Scale and cloud partner status combined with Eastern European rates | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| DataArt | Travel and finance firms, long-term nearshore teams. | Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software | Broad-scope outsourcing, Scandinavian-owned vendor. | Swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Apadmi | UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Thoughtworks | Complex modernisation, engineering culture change. | Thought leadership in software practice, backed by a large global delivery network | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Hippo Digital | Public bodies wanting user-centred service design. | User research and service design led delivery for UK public services | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Version 1 | Oracle and Microsoft estates, public-sector managed services. | Managed services for Oracle, Microsoft and AWS estates with Indian and Spanish delivery | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Box UK | Mid-sized web and e-commerce builds. | Small Welsh team with long-standing enterprise web clients | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Itransition | Budget-conscious buyers, broad generalist work. | Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services | 3.8 | Full comparison |
Future Processing FAQ
What is Future Processing?
Polish software house with a London office, a UK managing director and a large financial-services client base
How much does Future Processing charge?
Future Processing uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Future Processing use?
Future Processing works with .NET, Java, Azure, AWS, React, Angular, Python, Power BI. Primary industries served include Financial services, Insurance, Energy, Media, Healthcare.
Is Future Processing right for enterprise?
UK insurers and financial firms, long-term nearshore teams. 750–1,000 team size. Main consideration: No hardware or embedded engineering capability, so connected-device products need a second supplier.
What are the best Future Processing alternatives?
The best alternatives to Future Processing depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: one team can own firmware, electronics, cloud back end and the user-facing app, managed from a london office
- Endava: uk headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations
- Godel Technologies: uk management and contracting with engineers spread across four eu and eu-adjacent countries
Compare Future Processing with other Software Development Outsourcing companies
Future Processing vs Lemberg Solutions Future Processing vs Endava Future Processing vs Godel Technologies Future Processing vs ELEKS Future Processing vs Amdaris (Insight) Future Processing vs Scott Logic Future Processing vs Softwire Future Processing vs N-iX Future Processing vs Spyrosoft Future Processing vs Equal Experts Future Processing vs STX Next Future Processing vs Kainos Future Processing vs Infinum Future Processing vs Made Tech Future Processing vs Zühlke Future Processing vs Codurance Future Processing vs Ciklum Future Processing vs BJSS (CGI) Future Processing vs AND Digital Future Processing vs SoftServe Future Processing vs DataArt Future Processing vs Sigma Software Future Processing vs Apadmi Future Processing vs Thoughtworks Future Processing vs Hippo Digital Future Processing vs EPAM Systems Future Processing vs Version 1 Future Processing vs Box UK Future Processing vs Itransition
Verify all details directly with Future Processing before making a decision.