Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.7/5) edges ahead of Future Processing (4.6/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for UK product companies, software plus hardware, nearshore rates. Future Processing is the stronger option for UK insurers and financial firms, long-term nearshore teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Future Processing |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Gliwice, Poland (London office) |
| Team size | 200+ | 750–1,000 |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | One team can own firmware, electronics, cloud back end and the user-facing app, managed from a London office | Twenty-five years of delivery from Poland with UK-based account leadership in the City |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, RTOS | .NET, Java, Azure |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Manufacturing | Financial services, Insurance, Energy, Media, Healthcare |
Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 and has grown to 200+ engineers working across embedded, cloud, data and AI, and web or mobile product development. UK clients deal with a London office at 25 Adelaide Road in West Ealing, while most engineering happens in Lviv and Kraków, with a further office in Hamburg. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Bosch Rexroth, Cellink, Ferno and Speede. The company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification and transfers all intellectual property to the client.
Future Processing
Future Processing started in Gliwice, Poland in 2000 and now employs roughly 800 people, with a London office at Gracechurch Street led by a UK managing director. Directory data puts around 45% of its work in financial services, with insurance, energy, media and healthcare making up much of the rest. It sells bespoke development, cloud and data work, and consulting. Delivery happens mainly in Poland, which keeps rates in the Central European band.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Future Processing |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Future Processing |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Future Processing |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Future Processing |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Financial services, Insurance, Energy |
| Best use cases | A UK medtech start-up needs firmware, a companion app and a cloud dashboard from one supplier., An industrial equipment maker wants to add connectivity and remote monitoring to an existing product line. | An insurer wants a dedicated .NET and Azure team to modernise policy administration systems., A UK fintech needs a nearshore squad to extend an in-house engineering team. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Covers the whole product, from electrical engineering and firmware through cloud and app development, so a UK buyer manages one supplier instead of three |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification gives procurement teams documented security and quality processes to review |
| + | Established partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help when a product depends on specific silicon |
| + | All intellectual property passes to the client, which removes a common sticking point in outsourcing contracts |
| + | An in-house hardware lab lets the team prototype and test devices without waiting on third-party facilities |
| + | Engineering rates in Ukraine and Poland sit well below London consultancy day rates, while the London office keeps account management local |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house, so you will need a separate manufacturing partner for physical products |
| - | Lemberg does not obtain regulatory certification for clients; it supplies the documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | At 200+ people it cannot staff the very large programmes that Endava or EPAM can |
| - | Some reviewers mention early friction over working hours before schedules were aligned with the client's time zone |
| Future Processing | |
|---|---|
| + | A London office with a UK managing director means escalations land with someone in your time zone |
| + | Heavy financial-services and insurance exposure suggests familiarity with UK regulated-sector procurement |
| + | Around 800 staff is large enough to grow a team quickly without the overhead of a 10,000-person vendor |
| + | Polish delivery is one hour ahead of the UK, so working days overlap almost completely |
| - | No hardware or embedded engineering capability, so connected-device products need a second supplier |
| - | Polish engineering rates have risen steadily and are now closer to Western European levels than they were a decade ago |
| - | Public pricing and minimum project sizes are not published |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a UK medtech start-up needs firmware, a companion app and a cloud dashboard from one supplier.
One team can own firmware, electronics, cloud back end and the user-facing app, managed from a London office. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Future Processing?
A typical fit: an insurer wants a dedicated .NET and Azure team to modernise policy administration systems.
Twenty-five years of delivery from Poland with UK-based account leadership in the City. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Insurance, Energy, Media, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Future Processing (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Future Processing fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK medtech start-up needs firmware, a companion app and a cloud dashboard from one supplier. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial equipment maker wants to add connectivity and remote monitoring to an existing product line. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An insurer wants a dedicated .NET and Azure team to modernise policy administration systems. | Limited | Strong | Future Processing |
| A UK fintech needs a nearshore squad to extend an in-house engineering team. | Limited | Strong | Future Processing |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing
Lemberg Solutions (4.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. One team can own firmware, electronics, cloud back end and the user-facing app, managed from a London office.
Future Processing (4.6/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a UK fintech needs a nearshore squad to extend an in-house engineering team. If your situation matches that, Future Processing is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Future Processing FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Future Processing?
Lemberg Solutions (4.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: covers the whole product, from electrical engineering and firmware through cloud and app development, so a UK buyer manages one supplier instead of three. Future Processing's strongest advantage: a London office with a UK managing director means escalations land with someone in your time zone.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Future Processing differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Future Processing uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Future Processing?
Future Processing is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Future Processing?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: one team can own firmware, electronics, cloud back end and the user-facing app, managed from a London office. Future Processing's primary differentiator is: twenty-five years of delivery from Poland with UK-based account leadership in the City. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 750–1,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Financial services, Insurance).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.