Codurance vs Apadmi: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Codurance (4.1/5) edges ahead of Apadmi (3.9/5) overall. Codurance is the better choice for legacy modernisation, engineering-practice improvement. Apadmi is the stronger option for UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Codurance vs Apadmi: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Codurance | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2009 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 150–300 | 250–300 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, Kotlin, C# | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Media, Public sector | Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector |
Codurance vs Apadmi: overview
Codurance
Mashooq Badar co-founded Codurance in London in 2013. Its pitch is software craftsmanship: test-driven development, pairing and clean architecture. Besides London and Manchester, it has offices in Barcelona, Madrid and Lisbon, which bring Iberian rates into the mix. Headcount estimates range from roughly 170 to 300.
Apadmi
Apadmi was founded in 2009 in Manchester and has its headquarters at MediaCity. It reported more than 300 employees in 2024, with hubs in London, Edinburgh, Lisbon and Amsterdam. The company builds and maintains mobile apps for large UK brands, including Argos, the BBC, Co-op, Asda and the NHS. Its Lisbon hub adds a lower-cost option within Western Europe.
Services and capabilities: Codurance vs Apadmi
| Capability | Codurance | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Codurance vs Apadmi
| Framework / platform | Codurance | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Codurance vs Apadmi
| Criterion | Codurance | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Team extension, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Codurance vs Apadmi
| Dimension | Codurance | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Media | Retail, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work., An engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. | A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt., An NHS body wants a patient app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Codurance vs Apadmi: pros and cons
| Codurance | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong on cleaning up legacy codebases and raising engineering standards |
| + | Spanish and Portuguese offices provide a cheaper option without leaving Western Europe |
| + | Coaching is built into engagements, so client teams improve along the way |
| - | Small team limits how fast it can staff a large programme |
| - | Iberian rates are higher than Central and Eastern European ones |
| Apadmi | |
|---|---|
| + | Mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise |
| + | Recognisable UK client list gives reassurance on quality |
| + | Lisbon hub offers some rate flexibility |
| - | Narrow focus; back-office and enterprise systems are not its core |
| - | Mostly UK delivery, so pricing is close to onshore rates |
Who should choose Codurance?
A typical fit: a company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work.
Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Media, Public sector.
Who should choose Apadmi?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt.
Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Codurance vs Apadmi
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Codurance |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Codurance (Not published) vs Apadmi (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Codurance |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Codurance |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Codurance vs Apadmi
| Use case | Codurance fit | Apadmi fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work. | Strong | Limited | Codurance |
| An engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. | Strong | Limited | Codurance |
| A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| An NHS body wants a patient app. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Codurance vs Apadmi
Codurance (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams.
Apadmi (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an NHS body wants a patient app. If your situation matches that, Apadmi is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Codurance vs Apadmi FAQ
Is Codurance better than Apadmi?
Codurance (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Codurance's strongest advantage: strong on cleaning up legacy codebases and raising engineering standards. Apadmi's strongest advantage: mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise.
How do Codurance and Apadmi differ in pricing?
Codurance uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Apadmi uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Codurance or Apadmi?
Apadmi is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Codurance and Apadmi?
Codurance's primary differentiator is: craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams. Apadmi's primary differentiator is: mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. They also differ in team size (150–300 vs 250–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Retail, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.