DataArt vs Apadmi: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
DataArt (4.0/5) edges ahead of Apadmi (3.9/5) overall. DataArt is the better choice for travel and finance firms, long-term nearshore teams. Apadmi is the stronger option for UK brands that need flagship mobile apps. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
DataArt vs Apadmi: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | DataArt | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1997 | 2009 |
| HQ | New York, United States (London office) | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 5,000–6,000 | 250–300 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering | Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, Python | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail | Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector |
DataArt vs Apadmi: overview
DataArt
Eugene Goland founded DataArt in New York in 1997, and the company opened in London in 2001. It reports more than 6,000 people as of September 2025, spread across Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America and elsewhere. Travel and hospitality, finance and healthcare are its strongest industries. UK clients get a long-standing London presence with delivery from lower-cost locations.
Apadmi
Apadmi was founded in 2009 in Manchester and has its headquarters at MediaCity. It reported more than 300 employees in 2024, with hubs in London, Edinburgh, Lisbon and Amsterdam. The company builds and maintains mobile apps for large UK brands, including Argos, the BBC, Co-op, Asda and the NHS. Its Lisbon hub adds a lower-cost option within Western Europe.
Services and capabilities: DataArt vs Apadmi
| Capability | DataArt | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: DataArt vs Apadmi
| Framework / platform | DataArt | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: DataArt vs Apadmi
| Criterion | DataArt | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: DataArt vs Apadmi
| Dimension | DataArt | Apadmi |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare | Retail, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work., A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. | A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt., An NHS body wants a patient app. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
DataArt vs Apadmi: pros and cons
| DataArt | |
|---|---|
| + | London office has been open since 2001 |
| + | Specialist knowledge of travel booking and distribution systems |
| + | Delivery spread across several regions |
| - | US headquarters means UK contracts may sit with a non-UK parent |
| - | Headcount estimates vary widely between sources |
| Apadmi | |
|---|---|
| + | Mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise |
| + | Recognisable UK client list gives reassurance on quality |
| + | Lisbon hub offers some rate flexibility |
| - | Narrow focus; back-office and enterprise systems are not its core |
| - | Mostly UK delivery, so pricing is close to onshore rates |
Who should choose DataArt?
A typical fit: a travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work.
Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Travel and hospitality, Financial services, Healthcare, Media, Retail.
Who should choose Apadmi?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt.
Mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Healthcare, Public sector.
Decision matrix: DataArt vs Apadmi
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Apadmi |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | DataArt |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: DataArt (Not published) vs Apadmi (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | DataArt |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: DataArt vs Apadmi
| Use case | DataArt fit | Apadmi fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A travel company needs booking-engine and distribution work. | Strong | Limited | DataArt |
| A financial firm wants legacy trading software modernised. | Strong | Limited | DataArt |
| A retailer needs a high-traffic shopping app rebuilt. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| An NHS body wants a patient app. | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Apadmi |
Verdict: DataArt vs Apadmi
DataArt (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering.
Apadmi (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an NHS body wants a patient app. If your situation matches that, Apadmi is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
DataArt vs Apadmi FAQ
Is DataArt better than Apadmi?
DataArt (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. DataArt's strongest advantage: london office has been open since 2001. Apadmi's strongest advantage: mobile focus brings deep iOS and Android expertise.
How do DataArt and Apadmi differ in pricing?
DataArt uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Apadmi uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: DataArt or Apadmi?
DataArt is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between DataArt and Apadmi?
DataArt's primary differentiator is: two decades of London presence and specialist travel-industry engineering. Apadmi's primary differentiator is: mobile-only specialism with a client list of household UK names. They also differ in team size (5,000–6,000 vs 250–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Travel and hospitality, Financial services vs Retail, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.