Infinum vs EPAM Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Infinum (4.1/5) edges ahead of EPAM Systems (3.9/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for consumer apps where design quality matters. EPAM Systems is the stronger option for FTSE-scale programmes, strict compliance, huge teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Infinum vs EPAM Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Infinum | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 1993 |
| HQ | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) | Newtown, Pennsylvania, United States (London and Newcastle offices) |
| Team size | 350–450 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps | The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, managed service, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing |
Infinum vs EPAM Systems: overview
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania. It reported more than 62,750 employees in Q1 2026. In the UK it has offices in London and Newcastle, but most delivery comes from Central and Eastern Europe, India and Latin America. Its size suits large regulated programmes better than small or mid-sized builds.
Services and capabilities: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
| Capability | Infinum | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
| Framework / platform | Infinum | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
| Criterion | Infinum | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
| Dimension | Infinum | EPAM Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Media, Healthcare | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | A bank needs a 200-person platform programme., A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Infinum vs EPAM Systems: pros and cons
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme |
| + | Mature security, audit and compliance processes for regulated buyers |
| + | Public-company reporting |
| - | Little benefit for mid-market buyers, who can get more attention elsewhere |
| - | UK offices are small relative to global delivery |
| - | Account processes are heavy for smaller projects |
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: a bank needs a 200-person platform programme.
The largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Media, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs EPAM Systems (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
| Use case | Infinum fit | EPAM Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A bank needs a 200-person platform programme. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| A global retailer wants a managed engineering service. | Limited | Strong | EPAM Systems |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Infinum vs EPAM Systems
Infinum (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps.
EPAM Systems (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a global retailer wants a managed engineering service. If your situation matches that, EPAM Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Infinum vs EPAM Systems FAQ
Is Infinum better than EPAM Systems?
Infinum (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: can staff hundreds of engineers on one programme.
How do Infinum and EPAM Systems differ in pricing?
Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. EPAM Systems uses time and materials, managed service, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or EPAM Systems?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Infinum and EPAM Systems?
Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: the largest delivery capacity on this list, with mature compliance and security processes. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Media vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.