Infinum vs SoftServe: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Infinum (4.1/5) edges ahead of SoftServe (4.0/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for consumer apps where design quality matters. SoftServe is the stronger option for big cloud and data programmes, Ukrainian rates at volume. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Infinum vs SoftServe: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 1993 |
| HQ | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) | Austin, United States and Lviv, Ukraine (London offices) |
| Team size | 350–450 | 10,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps | Scale and cloud partner status combined with Eastern European rates |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Dedicated team, time and materials, managed service |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter | AWS, Google Cloud, Azure |
| Industries served | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail | Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Manufacturing, Media |
Infinum vs SoftServe: overview
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
SoftServe
SoftServe was founded in Lviv in 1993 and is now co-headquartered in Austin, Texas. Revelio Labs estimated about 13,100 employees in 2025, down roughly 3% on the year. It opened its London office around 2014 as part of a Western European expansion and trades in the UK as SoftServe Systems Ltd. Most delivery happens in Ukraine, Poland, Bulgaria and Latin America.
Services and capabilities: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Capability | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Framework / platform | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Criterion | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Dimension | Infinum | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Financial services, Media, Healthcare | Healthcare, Retail, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | A retailer needs a large cloud migration team., A healthcare firm wants a data platform with machine learning features. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Infinum vs SoftServe: pros and cons
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
| SoftServe | |
|---|---|
| + | Very large talent pool for fast ramp-up |
| + | Strong cloud and data engineering practices |
| + | Lower rates than UK-headquartered vendors of similar size |
| - | UK office is mostly a commercial presence; delivery is overseas |
| - | Smaller UK accounts may struggle to get senior attention |
| - | Headcount has edged down since 2024 |
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Who should choose SoftServe?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a large cloud migration team.
Scale and cloud partner status combined with Eastern European rates. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Manufacturing, Media.
Decision matrix: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Infinum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | SoftServe |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs SoftServe (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | SoftServe |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | SoftServe |
Use case fit: Infinum vs SoftServe
| Use case | Infinum fit | SoftServe fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
| A retailer needs a large cloud migration team. | Limited | Strong | SoftServe |
| A healthcare firm wants a data platform with machine learning features. | Limited | Strong | SoftServe |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Strong | SoftServe |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Infinum |
Verdict: Infinum vs SoftServe
Infinum (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps.
SoftServe (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a healthcare firm wants a data platform with machine learning features. If your situation matches that, SoftServe is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Infinum vs SoftServe FAQ
Is Infinum better than SoftServe?
Infinum (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products. SoftServe's strongest advantage: very large talent pool for fast ramp-up.
How do Infinum and SoftServe differ in pricing?
Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. SoftServe uses dedicated team, time and materials, managed service pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or SoftServe?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Infinum and SoftServe?
Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. SoftServe's primary differentiator is: scale and cloud partner status combined with Eastern European rates. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 10,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Media vs Healthcare, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.