Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

Infinum vs Zühlke: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Infinum (4.1/5) edges ahead of Zühlke (4.1/5) overall. Infinum is the better choice for consumer apps where design quality matters. Zühlke is the stronger option for regulated industries, medical devices, banking. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Infinum vs Zühlke: head-to-head summary

Criterion Infinum Zühlke
Founded 2005 1968
HQ Zagreb, Croatia (London office) Schlieren, Switzerland (UK offices in London, Manchester, Edinburgh)
Team size 350–450 1,500–2,000
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.1 / 5
Primary differentiator In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps Swiss engineering discipline in regulated sectors with a UK team of about 150
Pricing model Time and materials, fixed price Time and materials, fixed price
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Swift, Kotlin, Flutter Java, .NET, Azure
Industries served Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail Financial services, Healthcare and medical devices, Public sector, Manufacturing

Infinum vs Zühlke: overview

Infinum

Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.

Zühlke

Zühlke was founded in Switzerland in 1968 and employs close to 2,000 people, with nearshore centres in Serbia, Bulgaria, Portugal and Vietnam. The UK business marked 25 years in 2025 and has nearly 150 staff across London, Manchester and Edinburgh, led by UK CEO Angela Bishop since October 2024. UK clients include HSBC and NHS England. Its medical-device and regulated-industry engineering background is unusual for a services firm of this size.

Services and capabilities: Infinum vs Zühlke

Capability Infinum Zühlke
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✓ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✗ ✓
Data & AI ✗ ✓
Legacy modernisation ✗ ✗
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✓
Dedicated team model ✗ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Infinum vs Zühlke

Framework / platform Infinum Zühlke
.NET N/A ✓
Java N/A ✓
Python N/A ✓
React ✓ ✓
AWS N/A ✓
Azure N/A ✓
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Embedded N/A ✓

Pricing comparison: Infinum vs Zühlke

Criterion Infinum Zühlke
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials Fixed project, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Infinum vs Zühlke

Dimension Infinum Zühlke
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial services, Media, Healthcare Financial services, Healthcare and medical devices, Public sector
Best use cases A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. A medtech company needs software developed under IEC 62304., A bank wants a regulated customer platform built with strong engineering governance.
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Infinum vs Zühlke: pros and cons

Infinum
+ Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products
+ EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms
+ A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person
- Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems
- Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth
Zühlke
+ Experience with medical device software regulations is rare among UK suppliers
+ Nearshore hubs give some cost flexibility beyond the UK team
+ Long-standing UK presence with named banking and NHS clients
- Swiss rate cards are high, even with nearshore staff in the mix
- The UK team is small relative to the group

Who should choose Infinum?

A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.

In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.

Who should choose Zühlke?

A typical fit: a medtech company needs software developed under IEC 62304.

Swiss engineering discipline in regulated sectors with a UK team of about 150. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare and medical devices, Public sector, Manufacturing.

Decision matrix: Infinum vs Zühlke

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Infinum
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Infinum (Not published) vs Zühlke (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Infinum
You want engineers added to your own in-house team Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Zühlke

Use case fit: Infinum vs Zühlke

Use case Infinum fit Zühlke fit Winner
A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. Strong Limited Infinum
A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. Strong Limited Infinum
A medtech company needs software developed under IEC 62304. Limited Strong Zühlke
A bank wants a regulated customer platform built with strong engineering governance. Limited Strong Zühlke
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Strong Zühlke
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Strong Both equally

Verdict: Infinum vs Zühlke

Infinum (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps.

Zühlke (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a bank wants a regulated customer platform built with strong engineering governance. If your situation matches that, Zühlke is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Infinum vs Zühlke FAQ

Is Infinum better than Zühlke?

Infinum (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products. Zühlke's strongest advantage: experience with medical device software regulations is rare among UK suppliers.

How do Infinum and Zühlke differ in pricing?

Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Zühlke uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Infinum or Zühlke?

Zühlke is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Infinum and Zühlke?

Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Zühlke's primary differentiator is: swiss engineering discipline in regulated sectors with a UK team of about 150. They also differ in team size (350–450 vs 1,500–2,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Media vs Financial services, Healthcare and medical devices).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.