N-iX vs Made Tech: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
N-iX (4.3/5) edges ahead of Made Tech (4.1/5) overall. N-iX is the better choice for large dedicated teams, data and cloud engineering, Ukrainian rates. Made Tech is the stronger option for UK central and local government buyers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
N-iX vs Made Tech: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | N-iX | Made Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2002 | 2008 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (UK entity in London) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 2,000–2,500 | 400–500 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly | Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, time and materials | Framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, Python | Ruby, Python, Java |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Telecoms, Manufacturing, Healthcare | Public sector, Local government, Healthcare |
N-iX vs Made Tech: overview
N-iX
N-iX started in Lviv in 2002 as Novellix, building applications for Novell's Linux platform, and Novell became its first large client. It now reports more than 2,400 engineers in Ukraine, Poland and other countries. In the UK it trades through N-iX Technologies Limited, registered in London in 2022, though public sources do not show a staffed UK delivery office. It suits buyers who want a large Central and Eastern European engineering pool and are comfortable managing it remotely.
Made Tech
Made Tech was founded in London in 2008 and listed on AIM in 2021. FY25 revenue (to May 2025) rose 20% to £46.4m with a contracted backlog of £92.2m, and the company reported around 430 employees after a period of hiring. Almost all of its work is for UK central and local government, health and other regulated bodies. Contractor use rose to 19% of the workforce in FY25, and management has said it plans to bring that back toward 10%.
Services and capabilities: N-iX vs Made Tech
| Capability | N-iX | Made Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: N-iX vs Made Tech
| Framework / platform | N-iX | Made Tech |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: N-iX vs Made Tech
| Criterion | N-iX | Made Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: N-iX vs Made Tech
| Dimension | N-iX | Made Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Telecoms | Public sector, Local government, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A retailer needs a 20-person data engineering team on Databricks., A telecoms company wants a long-term dedicated team for platform development. | A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced., A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
N-iX vs Made Tech: pros and cons
| N-iX | |
|---|---|
| + | Large engineering pool makes it practical to grow from 5 to 50 people on one account |
| + | Data engineering and cloud migration are well covered |
| + | Some embedded and IoT capability for connected-product work |
| - | UK presence appears to be a legal entity rather than a staffed delivery office |
| - | Most engineering is in Ukraine, so continuity planning should be part of due diligence |
| Made Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks |
| + | Public reporting makes financial health easy to check |
| + | A growing backlog points to sustained repeat business from government |
| - | Little private-sector experience, so commercial buyers have better options |
| - | No offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates |
| - | Contractor reliance roughly doubled in FY25 |
Who should choose N-iX?
A typical fit: a retailer needs a 20-person data engineering team on Databricks.
A 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Telecoms, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Who should choose Made Tech?
A typical fit: a council wants legacy case-management systems replaced.
Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Local government, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: N-iX vs Made Tech
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Made Tech |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | N-iX |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: N-iX (Not published) vs Made Tech (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | N-iX |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | N-iX |
Use case fit: N-iX vs Made Tech
| Use case | N-iX fit | Made Tech fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A retailer needs a 20-person data engineering team on Databricks. | Strong | Limited | N-iX |
| A telecoms company wants a long-term dedicated team for platform development. | Strong | Limited | N-iX |
| A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced. | Limited | Strong | Made Tech |
| A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. | Limited | Strong | Made Tech |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Strong | Limited | N-iX |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Made Tech |
Verdict: N-iX vs Made Tech
N-iX (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. A 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly.
Made Tech (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. If your situation matches that, Made Tech is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
N-iX vs Made Tech FAQ
Is N-iX better than Made Tech?
N-iX (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. N-iX's strongest advantage: large engineering pool makes it practical to grow from 5 to 50 people on one account. Made Tech's strongest advantage: deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks.
How do N-iX and Made Tech differ in pricing?
N-iX uses dedicated team, time and materials pricing. Made Tech uses framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: N-iX or Made Tech?
N-iX is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between N-iX and Made Tech?
N-iX's primary differentiator is: a 2,400-engineer pool that can staff large data and cloud teams quickly. Made Tech's primary differentiator is: public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. They also differ in team size (2,000–2,500 vs 400–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Public sector, Local government).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.