Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) edges ahead of Codurance (4.1/5) overall. Amdaris (Insight) is the better choice for UK firms on Azure, .NET modernisation, Eastern European rates. Codurance is the stronger option for legacy modernisation, engineering-practice improvement. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Amdaris (Insight) | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| HQ | Bristol, United Kingdom (owned by Insight Enterprises) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 800+ | 150–300 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe | Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | .NET, Azure, AWS | Java, Kotlin, C# |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector | Financial services, Retail, Media, Public sector |
Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance: overview
Amdaris (Insight)
Amdaris was set up in 2009 by Andy Rogers and Vlad Nanu and grew from Bristol into a business of 800+ people, with delivery centres in Moldova and Romania. US-based Insight Enterprises, a Fortune 500 solutions integrator, bought it in August 2023 and folded it into its application and data practices. The UK client relationship remains Bristol-led. Buyers should expect Amdaris to sit inside a larger Insight sales motion now.
Codurance
Mashooq Badar co-founded Codurance in London in 2013. Its pitch is software craftsmanship: test-driven development, pairing and clean architecture. Besides London and Manchester, it has offices in Barcelona, Madrid and Lisbon, which bring Iberian rates into the mix. Headcount estimates range from roughly 170 to 300.
Services and capabilities: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
| Capability | Amdaris (Insight) | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
| Framework / platform | Amdaris (Insight) | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| Python | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
| Criterion | Amdaris (Insight) | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Team extension, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
| Dimension | Amdaris (Insight) | Codurance |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail | Financial services, Retail, Media |
| Best use cases | A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure., A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. | A company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work., An engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance: pros and cons
| Amdaris (Insight) | |
|---|---|
| + | Moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor |
| + | Strong Microsoft and .NET focus suits companies already invested in Azure |
| + | Insight's backing adds financial stability and wider infrastructure services |
| - | Acquired by Insight Enterprises in 2023, so priorities may shift toward Insight's own product and licensing business |
| - | Less depth outside the Microsoft stack than broader engineering firms |
| - | Delivery locations are close to the war in Ukraine, which some risk teams will flag |
| Codurance | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong on cleaning up legacy codebases and raising engineering standards |
| + | Spanish and Portuguese offices provide a cheaper option without leaving Western Europe |
| + | Coaching is built into engagements, so client teams improve along the way |
| - | Small team limits how fast it can staff a large programme |
| - | Iberian rates are higher than Central and Eastern European ones |
Who should choose Amdaris (Insight)?
A typical fit: a UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure.
A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector.
Who should choose Codurance?
A typical fit: a company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work.
Craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Media, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Amdaris (Insight) |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Amdaris (Insight) |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Amdaris (Insight) (Not published) vs Codurance (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Amdaris (Insight) |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Codurance |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
| Use case | Amdaris (Insight) fit | Codurance fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure. | Strong | Limited | Amdaris (Insight) |
| A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. | Strong | Limited | Amdaris (Insight) |
| A company needs a monolith split into services without stopping feature work. | Limited | Strong | Codurance |
| An engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. | Limited | Strong | Codurance |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe.
Codurance (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an engineering team wants to adopt test-driven development and pairing with outside help. If your situation matches that, Codurance is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Amdaris (Insight) vs Codurance FAQ
Is Amdaris (Insight) better than Codurance?
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Amdaris (Insight)'s strongest advantage: moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor. Codurance's strongest advantage: strong on cleaning up legacy codebases and raising engineering standards.
How do Amdaris (Insight) and Codurance differ in pricing?
Amdaris (Insight) uses dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Codurance uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Amdaris (Insight) or Codurance?
Codurance is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Amdaris (Insight) and Codurance?
Amdaris (Insight)'s primary differentiator is: a UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. Codurance's primary differentiator is: craftsmanship-led delivery that also coaches in-house teams. They also differ in team size (800+ vs 150–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Financial services, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.