Endava vs Amdaris (Insight): full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. Amdaris (Insight) is the stronger option for UK firms on Azure, .NET modernisation, Eastern European rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Amdaris (Insight): head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Amdaris (Insight) |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2009 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Bristol, United Kingdom (owned by Insight Enterprises) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 800+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | .NET, Azure, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector |
Endava vs Amdaris (Insight): overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
Amdaris (Insight)
Amdaris was set up in 2009 by Andy Rogers and Vlad Nanu and grew from Bristol into a business of 800+ people, with delivery centres in Moldova and Romania. US-based Insight Enterprises, a Fortune 500 solutions integrator, bought it in August 2023 and folded it into its application and data practices. The UK client relationship remains Bristol-led. Buyers should expect Amdaris to sit inside a larger Insight sales motion now.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
| Capability | Endava | Amdaris (Insight) |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
| Framework / platform | Endava | Amdaris (Insight) |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
| Criterion | Endava | Amdaris (Insight) |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
| Dimension | Endava | Amdaris (Insight) |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure., A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Amdaris (Insight): pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| Amdaris (Insight) | |
|---|---|
| + | Moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor |
| + | Strong Microsoft and .NET focus suits companies already invested in Azure |
| + | Insight's backing adds financial stability and wider infrastructure services |
| - | Acquired by Insight Enterprises in 2023, so priorities may shift toward Insight's own product and licensing business |
| - | Less depth outside the Microsoft stack than broader engineering firms |
| - | Delivery locations are close to the war in Ukraine, which some risk teams will flag |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose Amdaris (Insight)?
A typical fit: a UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure.
A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Amdaris (Insight) |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Amdaris (Insight) (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
| Use case | Endava fit | Amdaris (Insight) fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure. | Limited | Strong | Amdaris (Insight) |
| A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. | Limited | Strong | Amdaris (Insight) |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Amdaris (Insight) |
Verdict: Endava vs Amdaris (Insight)
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. If your situation matches that, Amdaris (Insight) is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Amdaris (Insight) FAQ
Is Endava better than Amdaris (Insight)?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. Amdaris (Insight)'s strongest advantage: moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor.
How do Endava and Amdaris (Insight) differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. Amdaris (Insight) uses dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Amdaris (Insight)?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Amdaris (Insight)?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Amdaris (Insight)'s primary differentiator is: a UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 800+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.