Endava vs Godel Technologies: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of Godel Technologies (4.4/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. Godel Technologies is the stronger option for UK mid-market firms wanting a UK-run nearshore team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Godel Technologies: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Godel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 1,000–2,000 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | UK management and contracting with engineers spread across four EU and EU-adjacent countries |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Dedicated team, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | .NET, Azure, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Retail, Financial services, Media, Travel |
Endava vs Godel Technologies: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
Godel Technologies
Godel Technologies was formed in 2002 and is run from Manchester, with engineering in Poland, Lithuania, Bulgaria and Ukraine after it scaled back its original Belarus base. Its 2022 accounts showed turnover of £80.8m and headcount of 1,811. Since then the trend has reversed: Revelio Labs estimated a 2.2% year-on-year fall in headcount by September 2025, and Belarusian outlet dev.by reported rate cuts and cancelled salary reviews. The UK-led model is still a good fit for UK buyers, but its recent direction deserves questions during due diligence.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Godel Technologies
| Capability | Endava | Godel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Godel Technologies
| Framework / platform | Endava | Godel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Godel Technologies
| Criterion | Endava | Godel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Godel Technologies
| Dimension | Endava | Godel Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Retail, Financial services, Media |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A UK retailer wants a long-running .NET and Azure squad managed from the North West., A mid-market company needs a nearshore team without dealing with a foreign contracting entity. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Godel Technologies: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| Godel Technologies | |
|---|---|
| + | Contracts, account management and senior leadership sit in Manchester |
| + | Delivery centres across several countries reduce exposure to any single location |
| + | Long list of UK retail and consumer-brand clients |
| - | Third-party data shows headcount slipping in 2025 after years of growth |
| - | Reported cost-cutting, including rate cuts and frozen salary reviews, may affect staff retention on your team |
| - | The move away from Belarus forced a large relocation of engineering capacity |
| - | Recent statutory accounts with headcount detail were not available at the time of review |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose Godel Technologies?
A typical fit: a UK retailer wants a long-running .NET and Azure squad managed from the North West.
UK management and contracting with engineers spread across four EU and EU-adjacent countries. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media, Travel.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Godel Technologies
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Godel Technologies (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Endava vs Godel Technologies
| Use case | Endava fit | Godel Technologies fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A UK retailer wants a long-running .NET and Azure squad managed from the North West. | Limited | Strong | Godel Technologies |
| A mid-market company needs a nearshore team without dealing with a foreign contracting entity. | Limited | Strong | Godel Technologies |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Godel Technologies
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
Godel Technologies (4.4/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a mid-market company needs a nearshore team without dealing with a foreign contracting entity. If your situation matches that, Godel Technologies is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Godel Technologies FAQ
Is Endava better than Godel Technologies?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. Godel Technologies's strongest advantage: Contracts, account management and senior leadership sit in Manchester.
How do Endava and Godel Technologies differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. Godel Technologies uses dedicated team, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Godel Technologies?
Godel Technologies is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Godel Technologies?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Godel Technologies's primary differentiator is: UK management and contracting with engineers spread across four EU and EU-adjacent countries. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 1,000–2,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Retail, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.