Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) edges ahead of Made Tech (4.1/5) overall. Amdaris (Insight) is the better choice for UK firms on Azure, .NET modernisation, Eastern European rates. Made Tech is the stronger option for UK central and local government buyers. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech: head-to-head summary

Criterion Amdaris (Insight) Made Tech
Founded 2009 2008
HQ Bristol, United Kingdom (owned by Insight Enterprises) London, United Kingdom
Team size 800+ 400–500
Rating 4.3 / 5 4.1 / 5
Primary differentiator A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog
Pricing model Dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price Framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack .NET, Azure, AWS Ruby, Python, Java
Industries served Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector Public sector, Local government, Healthcare

Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech: overview

Amdaris (Insight)

Amdaris was set up in 2009 by Andy Rogers and Vlad Nanu and grew from Bristol into a business of 800+ people, with delivery centres in Moldova and Romania. US-based Insight Enterprises, a Fortune 500 solutions integrator, bought it in August 2023 and folded it into its application and data practices. The UK client relationship remains Bristol-led. Buyers should expect Amdaris to sit inside a larger Insight sales motion now.

Made Tech

Made Tech was founded in London in 2008 and listed on AIM in 2021. FY25 revenue (to May 2025) rose 20% to £46.4m with a contracted backlog of £92.2m, and the company reported around 430 employees after a period of hiring. Almost all of its work is for UK central and local government, health and other regulated bodies. Contractor use rose to 19% of the workforce in FY25, and management has said it plans to bring that back toward 10%.

Services and capabilities: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Capability Amdaris (Insight) Made Tech
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✗ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✓ ✓
Data & AI ✗ ✓
Legacy modernisation ✓ ✓
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✗
Dedicated team model ✓ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Framework / platform Amdaris (Insight) Made Tech
.NET ✓ N/A
Java N/A ✓
Python N/A ✓
React ✓ N/A
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Embedded N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Criterion Amdaris (Insight) Made Tech
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials Fixed project, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Dimension Amdaris (Insight) Made Tech
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial services, Healthcare, Retail Public sector, Local government, Healthcare
Best use cases A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure., A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced., A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service.
Typical project type Dedicated team Fixed project

Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech: pros and cons

Amdaris (Insight)
+ Moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor
+ Strong Microsoft and .NET focus suits companies already invested in Azure
+ Insight's backing adds financial stability and wider infrastructure services
- Acquired by Insight Enterprises in 2023, so priorities may shift toward Insight's own product and licensing business
- Less depth outside the Microsoft stack than broader engineering firms
- Delivery locations are close to the war in Ukraine, which some risk teams will flag
Made Tech
+ Deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks
+ Public reporting makes financial health easy to check
+ A growing backlog points to sustained repeat business from government
- Little private-sector experience, so commercial buyers have better options
- No offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates
- Contractor reliance roughly doubled in FY25

Who should choose Amdaris (Insight)?

A typical fit: a UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure.

A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector.

Who should choose Made Tech?

A typical fit: a council wants legacy case-management systems replaced.

Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Local government, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Amdaris (Insight)
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Amdaris (Insight)
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Amdaris (Insight) (Not published) vs Made Tech (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Amdaris (Insight)
You want engineers added to your own in-house team Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Neither; consider an embedded specialist

Use case fit: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Use case Amdaris (Insight) fit Made Tech fit Winner
A UK insurer wants a legacy .NET Framework system moved to modern .NET on Azure. Strong Limited Amdaris (Insight)
A company needs a cost-efficient dedicated team for ongoing product development. Strong Limited Amdaris (Insight)
A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced. Limited Strong Made Tech
A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. Limited Strong Made Tech
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Limited Both equally
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Strong Both equally

Verdict: Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech

Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. A UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe.

Made Tech (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. If your situation matches that, Made Tech is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Amdaris (Insight) vs Made Tech FAQ

Is Amdaris (Insight) better than Made Tech?

Amdaris (Insight) (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Amdaris (Insight)'s strongest advantage: moldovan delivery is among the lowest-cost options on this list for a UK-managed vendor. Made Tech's strongest advantage: deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks.

How do Amdaris (Insight) and Made Tech differ in pricing?

Amdaris (Insight) uses dedicated team, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Made Tech uses framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Amdaris (Insight) or Made Tech?

Made Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Amdaris (Insight) and Made Tech?

Amdaris (Insight)'s primary differentiator is: a UK base in Bristol with delivery from Moldova, one of the lower-cost locations in Europe. Made Tech's primary differentiator is: public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. They also differ in team size (800+ vs 400–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Public sector, Local government).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.