BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
BJSS (CGI) (4.0/5) edges ahead of AND Digital (4.0/5) overall. BJSS (CGI) is the better choice for NHS and government programmes, large onshore delivery. AND Digital is the stronger option for companies building in-house digital capability. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | BJSS (CGI) | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2014 |
| HQ | Leeds, United Kingdom (owned by CGI) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 2,000–2,500 | 1,000–1,500 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network | Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, managed service | Time and materials, capability-based |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | JavaScript, TypeScript, React |
| Industries served | Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Retail, Energy | Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector |
BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital: overview
BJSS (CGI)
BJSS was founded in Leeds in 1993 and grew into one of the UK's largest independent technology consultancies before CGI completed its acquisition in February 2025. The deal brought about 2,400 BJSS staff into CGI and took CGI's UK headcount past 8,500. BJSS teams are being merged into CGI's metro-based UK operating model. UK clients get the scale and governance of a global group, with nearshore capacity now available through CGI centres such as Portugal.
AND Digital
AND Digital was founded in 2014 by CEO Paramjit Uppal and is organised into city-based units it calls clubs. It passed 1,000 employees in 2021, and current third-party estimates range from 600 to 1,350. Its pitch is to build products while training the client's own people to take over. Delivery is largely UK-based, with smaller operations in the Netherlands and the US East Coast.
Services and capabilities: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
| Capability | BJSS (CGI) | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
| Framework / platform | BJSS (CGI) | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
| Criterion | BJSS (CGI) | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Managed service, Time and materials | Team extension, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
| Dimension | BJSS (CGI) | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services | Retail, Financial services, Media |
| Best use cases | An NHS trust needs a national-scale digital service., A bank wants a large onshore team with independent testing. | A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it., A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Team extension |
BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital: pros and cons
| BJSS (CGI) | |
|---|---|
| + | Long record on large NHS and government programmes |
| + | CGI ownership adds financial stability and access to nearshore centres |
| + | Strong testing and quality engineering practice |
| - | Acquired by CGI in 2025, and integration into CGI's model may change account teams and processes |
| - | Large-consultancy pricing and governance are heavy for small projects |
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency |
| + | Regional clubs give UK clients a local team in many cities |
| + | Good fit for digital product work in retail and consumer brands |
| - | Onshore model means no offshore cost advantage |
| - | Headcount figures vary widely between sources |
Who should choose BJSS (CGI)?
A typical fit: an NHS trust needs a national-scale digital service.
Large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Retail, Energy.
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: a retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it.
Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector.
Decision matrix: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | BJSS (CGI) |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: BJSS (CGI) (Not published) vs AND Digital (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | BJSS (CGI) |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | AND Digital |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
| Use case | BJSS (CGI) fit | AND Digital fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An NHS trust needs a national-scale digital service. | Strong | Limited | BJSS (CGI) |
| A bank wants a large onshore team with independent testing. | Strong | Limited | BJSS (CGI) |
| A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it. | Limited | Strong | AND Digital |
| A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. | Limited | Strong | AND Digital |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | BJSS (CGI) |
Verdict: BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital
BJSS (CGI) (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network.
AND Digital (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. If your situation matches that, AND Digital is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
BJSS (CGI) vs AND Digital FAQ
Is BJSS (CGI) better than AND Digital?
BJSS (CGI) (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. BJSS (CGI)'s strongest advantage: long record on large NHS and government programmes. AND Digital's strongest advantage: knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency.
How do BJSS (CGI) and AND Digital differ in pricing?
BJSS (CGI) uses time and materials, fixed price, managed service pricing. AND Digital uses time and materials, capability-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: BJSS (CGI) or AND Digital?
BJSS (CGI) is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between BJSS (CGI) and AND Digital?
BJSS (CGI)'s primary differentiator is: large UK onshore delivery capacity, now backed by CGI's global network. AND Digital's primary differentiator is: delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. They also differ in team size (2,000–2,500 vs 1,000–1,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Healthcare vs Retail, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.