ELEKS vs AND Digital: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ELEKS (4.4/5) edges ahead of AND Digital (4.0/5) overall. ELEKS is the better choice for data-heavy custom software, Ukrainian rates, mature processes. AND Digital is the stronger option for companies building in-house digital capability. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
ELEKS vs AND Digital: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | ELEKS | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1991 | 2014 |
| HQ | Tallinn, Estonia (engineering in Lviv; London office) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 2,000+ | 1,000–1,500 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit | Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, capability-based |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | .NET, Java, Python | JavaScript, TypeScript, React |
| Industries served | Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail | Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector |
ELEKS vs AND Digital: overview
ELEKS
ELEKS began in Lviv in 1991, which makes it one of the oldest software companies in Ukraine. It now lists Tallinn, Estonia as its corporate headquarters and keeps a London office on Beech Street. Around 2,000 specialists work on custom software, data science, and research and development projects, mostly from Ukraine and Poland. Its long history with Western European clients shows in fairly mature delivery processes.
AND Digital
AND Digital was founded in 2014 by CEO Paramjit Uppal and is organised into city-based units it calls clubs. It passed 1,000 employees in 2021, and current third-party estimates range from 600 to 1,350. Its pitch is to build products while training the client's own people to take over. Delivery is largely UK-based, with smaller operations in the Netherlands and the US East Coast.
Services and capabilities: ELEKS vs AND Digital
| Capability | ELEKS | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: ELEKS vs AND Digital
| Framework / platform | ELEKS | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: ELEKS vs AND Digital
| Criterion | ELEKS | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Team extension, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: ELEKS vs AND Digital
| Dimension | ELEKS | AND Digital |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Mid-market to enterprise |
| Best industries | Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare | Retail, Financial services, Media |
| Best use cases | A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software., A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. | A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it., A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Team extension |
ELEKS vs AND Digital: pros and cons
| ELEKS | |
|---|---|
| + | Thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract |
| + | A London office gives UK buyers a local contracting and meeting point |
| + | Data science and analytics work is a genuine strength alongside general development |
| + | Rates are in the Ukrainian band, well under UK onshore pricing |
| - | Most engineering is in Ukraine, so buyers should review continuity plans given the war |
| - | The London office is mainly a sales and account presence, not a delivery centre |
| AND Digital | |
|---|---|
| + | Knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency |
| + | Regional clubs give UK clients a local team in many cities |
| + | Good fit for digital product work in retail and consumer brands |
| - | Onshore model means no offshore cost advantage |
| - | Headcount figures vary widely between sources |
Who should choose ELEKS?
A typical fit: a logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software.
Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Logistics, Healthcare, Media, Retail.
Who should choose AND Digital?
A typical fit: a retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it.
Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector.
Decision matrix: ELEKS vs AND Digital
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ELEKS |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | ELEKS |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: ELEKS (Not published) vs AND Digital (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ELEKS |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | AND Digital |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: ELEKS vs AND Digital
| Use case | ELEKS fit | AND Digital fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A logistics firm wants route and demand forecasting built into its operations software. | Strong | Limited | ELEKS |
| A UK company needs a dedicated team for a multi-year product build at nearshore rates. | Strong | Limited | ELEKS |
| A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it. | Limited | Strong | AND Digital |
| A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. | Limited | Strong | AND Digital |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | ELEKS |
Verdict: ELEKS vs AND Digital
ELEKS (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit.
AND Digital (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. If your situation matches that, AND Digital is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
ELEKS vs AND Digital FAQ
Is ELEKS better than AND Digital?
ELEKS (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ELEKS's strongest advantage: thirty-plus years in business is a strong signal of stability for a long contract. AND Digital's strongest advantage: knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency.
How do ELEKS and AND Digital differ in pricing?
ELEKS uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. AND Digital uses time and materials, capability-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: ELEKS or AND Digital?
AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between ELEKS and AND Digital?
ELEKS's primary differentiator is: three decades of outsourced delivery with an in-house research and development unit. AND Digital's primary differentiator is: delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs 1,000–1,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Logistics vs Retail, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.