Endava vs Itransition: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of Itransition (3.8/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. Itransition is the stronger option for budget-conscious buyers, broad generalist work. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Itransition: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1998 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Tbilisi, Georgia (London office) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | .NET, Java, PHP |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Logistics |
Endava vs Itransition: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
Itransition
Itransition has been delivering software since 1998 and reports more than 3,000 engineers serving clients in over 40 countries. It lists a London office, while PitchBook gives Tbilisi, Georgia as its corporate office. Historically its delivery base was in Belarus, and it has since built up other locations. Its services span custom development, Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics, and testing.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Itransition
| Capability | Endava | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Itransition
| Framework / platform | Endava | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Itransition
| Criterion | Endava | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Itransition
| Dimension | Endava | Itransition |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Healthcare, Retail, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate., A retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Itransition: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| Itransition | |
|---|---|
| + | Among the lowest rates for a vendor of this size |
| + | Covers CRM platforms such as Salesforce and Dynamics as well as custom builds |
| + | Large team for staffing flexibility |
| - | Thin evidence of UK-based delivery or account leadership |
| - | Corporate location data is inconsistent between sources |
| - | Historical Belarus base may raise questions with some UK procurement teams |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose Itransition?
A typical fit: a company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate.
Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Itransition
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Itransition |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Itransition (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Neither; consider an embedded specialist |
Use case fit: Endava vs Itransition
| Use case | Endava fit | Itransition fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate. | Limited | Strong | Itransition |
| A retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. | Limited | Strong | Itransition |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Itransition |
Verdict: Endava vs Itransition
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
Itransition (3.8/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. If your situation matches that, Itransition is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Itransition FAQ
Is Endava better than Itransition?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. Itransition's strongest advantage: among the lowest rates for a vendor of this size.
How do Endava and Itransition differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. Itransition uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Itransition?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Itransition?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Itransition's primary differentiator is: low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 3,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Healthcare, Retail).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.