Endava vs Sigma Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software (4.0/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. Sigma Software is the stronger option for broad-scope outsourcing, Scandinavian-owned vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Sigma Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Stockholm, Sweden and Kyiv, Ukraine (UK presence) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | Swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, .NET, C++ |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Automotive, Telecoms, Financial services, Media, Healthcare |
Endava vs Sigma Software: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
Sigma Software
Sigma Software was founded in 2002 and belongs to the Swedish Sigma group. It describes a team of over 2,100 professionals in 40 offices across 19 countries, with most engineering in Ukraine and Poland. Directories list it inconsistently as UK-based or Stockholm-based, which reflects its mix of Swedish ownership and international offices. It covers a broad range of services and industries.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Sigma Software
| Capability | Endava | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Sigma Software
| Framework / platform | Endava | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Sigma Software
| Criterion | Endava | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Sigma Software
| Dimension | Endava | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Automotive, Telecoms, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | A telecoms firm needs network software engineers., An automotive supplier wants embedded developers. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Sigma Software: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| Sigma Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Swedish parent adds governance and financial backing |
| + | Broad technical range, including embedded and automotive |
| + | Ukrainian and Polish rates |
| - | UK office details are hard to confirm from public sources |
| - | Breadth means less obvious specialism in any one area |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose Sigma Software?
A typical fit: a telecoms firm needs network software engineers.
Swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecoms, Financial services, Media, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Sigma Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sigma Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Sigma Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Sigma Software |
Use case fit: Endava vs Sigma Software
| Use case | Endava fit | Sigma Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A telecoms firm needs network software engineers. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| An automotive supplier wants embedded developers. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
Verdict: Endava vs Sigma Software
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
Sigma Software (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an automotive supplier wants embedded developers. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Sigma Software FAQ
Is Endava better than Sigma Software?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. Sigma Software's strongest advantage: swedish parent adds governance and financial backing.
How do Endava and Sigma Software differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. Sigma Software uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Sigma Software?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Sigma Software?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Sigma Software's primary differentiator is: swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Automotive, Telecoms).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.