Endava vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.5/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (4.2/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for large UK programmes, payments and banking, nearshore at volume. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for automotive and industrial software, UK-led Polish teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2016 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Wrocław, Poland (UK office in Dorset) |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations | Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | C++, Java, .NET |
| Industries served | Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare |
Endava vs Spyrosoft: overview
Endava
Endava is the largest UK-headquartered company on this list built around nearshore delivery. It reported 11,479 staff at the end of June 2025, and the UK supplied 33% of revenue in the final quarter of that fiscal year. Delivery centres in Romania, Moldova, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Argentina and elsewhere let it staff large programmes at below-London cost. Headcount fell from 12,085 a year earlier, which reflects softer demand across the IT services market.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was set up in 2016 by a group that included UK-based co-founder Andrew Radcliffe, and its UK entity actually came before its first Polish office. It is headquartered in Wrocław and has grown quickly, with figures ranging from around 800 to 1,900 staff depending on the source. Spyrosoft Ltd runs UK operations from Dorset, with delivery mostly in Poland. Automotive, embedded and industrial software are notable strengths next to standard web and cloud work.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Endava | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Endava | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Endava | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Endava | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Payments, Retail | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing |
| Best use cases | A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme., A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers., A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration |
| + | A UK board and London HQ simplify contracting and data-protection discussions for UK buyers |
| + | Delivery from several countries spreads risk if one location is disrupted |
| + | Long payments and banking track record with UK and European institutions |
| - | Headcount dropped about 5% in the year to June 2025 as demand softened |
| - | Smaller projects can get less senior attention than flagship accounts |
| - | Day rates are higher than those of smaller Central European vendors |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire |
| + | Embedded and automotive work adds range for hardware-adjacent projects |
| + | Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, so financial results are public |
| - | Rapid growth through hiring and acquisitions can mean uneven maturity between business units |
| - | The UK office is small; nearly all engineers are in Poland |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme.
UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Payments, Retail, Media and telecoms, Healthcare.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers.
Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Spyrosoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Spyrosoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Spyrosoft |
Use case fit: Endava vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Endava fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank needs 50+ engineers for a multi-year core platform programme. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| A payments company wants a managed service covering development, testing and support. | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
Verdict: Endava vs Spyrosoft
Endava (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations.
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Endava better than Spyrosoft?
Endava (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: public-company reporting gives buyers audited figures on headcount, revenue and client concentration. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire.
How do Endava and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Endava uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based contracts pricing. Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Spyrosoft?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Spyrosoft?
Endava's primary differentiator is: UK headquarters and governance with more than 10,000 engineers in lower-cost nearshore locations. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 1,500+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Payments vs Automotive, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.