Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

Kainos vs AND Digital: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Kainos (4.2/5) edges ahead of AND Digital (4.0/5) overall. Kainos is the better choice for UK government digital services, Workday programmes. AND Digital is the stronger option for companies building in-house digital capability. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Kainos vs AND Digital: head-to-head summary

Criterion Kainos AND Digital
Founded 1986 2014
HQ Belfast, United Kingdom London, United Kingdom
Team size 3,000+ 1,000–1,500
Rating 4.2 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff
Pricing model Time and materials, fixed price, framework call-offs Time and materials, capability-based
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Java, .NET, AWS JavaScript, TypeScript, React
Industries served Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Commercial enterprises Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector

Kainos vs AND Digital: overview

Kainos

Kainos was founded in Belfast in 1986 and is listed on the London Stock Exchange. In the year to March 2026 it reported revenue of £431.1m, up 17%, and a workforce of 3,216 after adding 420 people, a rebound from a 2024/25 restructuring that cut staff by 7%. It runs three divisions: Digital Services, Workday Services and Workday Products. Its government work spans departments such as the Home Office and NHS bodies, delivered from the UK and Ireland.

AND Digital

AND Digital was founded in 2014 by CEO Paramjit Uppal and is organised into city-based units it calls clubs. It passed 1,000 employees in 2021, and current third-party estimates range from 600 to 1,350. Its pitch is to build products while training the client's own people to take over. Delivery is largely UK-based, with smaller operations in the Netherlands and the US East Coast.

Services and capabilities: Kainos vs AND Digital

Capability Kainos AND Digital
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✗ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✓ ✓
Data & AI ✓ ✗
Legacy modernisation ✓ ✗
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✗
Dedicated team model ✗ ✗
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✗

Tech stack comparison: Kainos vs AND Digital

Framework / platform Kainos AND Digital
.NET ✓ N/A
Java ✓ ✓
Python ✓ N/A
React N/A ✓
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Kubernetes ✓ N/A
Embedded N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Kainos vs AND Digital

Criterion Kainos AND Digital
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials Team extension, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Kainos vs AND Digital

Dimension Kainos AND Digital
Best company size Startup to mid-market Mid-market to enterprise
Best industries Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services Retail, Financial services, Media
Best use cases A government department needs a GOV.UK service built and run., An NHS body wants a digital patient service delivered onshore. A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it., A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year.
Typical project type Fixed project Team extension

Kainos vs AND Digital: pros and cons

Kainos
+ Belfast-based delivery costs less than London while staying UK-based
+ Public reporting gives buyers verified financials and headcount
+ Very familiar with UK public-sector procurement frameworks
- Little offshore capacity, so rates do not compete with nearshore vendors
- Workday business takes a growing share of leadership focus
- The 2024/25 restructuring shows exposure to swings in public-sector spending
AND Digital
+ Knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency
+ Regional clubs give UK clients a local team in many cities
+ Good fit for digital product work in retail and consumer brands
- Onshore model means no offshore cost advantage
- Headcount figures vary widely between sources

Who should choose Kainos?

A typical fit: a government department needs a GOV.UK service built and run.

Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Healthcare, Financial services, Commercial enterprises.

Who should choose AND Digital?

A typical fit: a retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it.

Delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Financial services, Media, Public sector.

Decision matrix: Kainos vs AND Digital

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Kainos
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Kainos (Not published) vs AND Digital (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Kainos
You want engineers added to your own in-house team AND Digital
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Neither; consider an embedded specialist

Use case fit: Kainos vs AND Digital

Use case Kainos fit AND Digital fit Winner
A government department needs a GOV.UK service built and run. Strong Limited Kainos
An NHS body wants a digital patient service delivered onshore. Strong Limited Kainos
A retailer wants a new web platform and an in-house team trained to run it. Limited Strong AND Digital
A financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. Limited Strong AND Digital
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Limited Both equally
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Limited Kainos

Verdict: Kainos vs AND Digital

Kainos (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE.

AND Digital (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a financial firm needs a product squad that hands over after a year. If your situation matches that, AND Digital is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Kainos vs AND Digital FAQ

Is Kainos better than AND Digital?

Kainos (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Kainos's strongest advantage: belfast-based delivery costs less than London while staying UK-based. AND Digital's strongest advantage: knowledge transfer is a stated goal, which reduces long-term dependency.

How do Kainos and AND Digital differ in pricing?

Kainos uses time and materials, fixed price, framework call-offs pricing. AND Digital uses time and materials, capability-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Kainos or AND Digital?

AND Digital is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Kainos and AND Digital?

Kainos's primary differentiator is: combined government digital delivery and Workday partnership, listed on the LSE. AND Digital's primary differentiator is: delivers products while explicitly upskilling the client's own staff. They also differ in team size (3,000+ vs 1,000–1,500), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Healthcare vs Retail, Financial services).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.