Best Software Development Outsourcing UK

Made Tech vs Itransition: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Made Tech (4.1/5) edges ahead of Itransition (3.8/5) overall. Made Tech is the better choice for UK central and local government buyers. Itransition is the stronger option for budget-conscious buyers, broad generalist work. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Made Tech vs Itransition: head-to-head summary

Criterion Made Tech Itransition
Founded 2008 1998
HQ London, United Kingdom Tbilisi, Georgia (London office)
Team size 400–500 3,000+
Rating 4.1 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services
Pricing model Framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Ruby, Python, Java .NET, Java, PHP
Industries served Public sector, Local government, Healthcare Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Logistics

Made Tech vs Itransition: overview

Made Tech

Made Tech was founded in London in 2008 and listed on AIM in 2021. FY25 revenue (to May 2025) rose 20% to £46.4m with a contracted backlog of £92.2m, and the company reported around 430 employees after a period of hiring. Almost all of its work is for UK central and local government, health and other regulated bodies. Contractor use rose to 19% of the workforce in FY25, and management has said it plans to bring that back toward 10%.

Itransition

Itransition has been delivering software since 1998 and reports more than 3,000 engineers serving clients in over 40 countries. It lists a London office, while PitchBook gives Tbilisi, Georgia as its corporate office. Historically its delivery base was in Belarus, and it has since built up other locations. Its services span custom development, Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics, and testing.

Services and capabilities: Made Tech vs Itransition

Capability Made Tech Itransition
Custom software development ✓ ✓
Mobile app development ✗ ✗
Cloud & DevOps ✓ ✗
Data & AI ✓ ✗
Legacy modernisation ✓ ✗
Embedded & IoT ✗ ✗
Dedicated team model ✗ ✓
Fixed-price projects ✓ ✓

Tech stack comparison: Made Tech vs Itransition

Framework / platform Made Tech Itransition
.NET N/A ✓
Java ✓ ✓
Python ✓ N/A
React N/A N/A
AWS ✓ ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Kubernetes N/A N/A
Embedded N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Made Tech vs Itransition

Criterion Made Tech Itransition
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Time and materials Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Made Tech vs Itransition

Dimension Made Tech Itransition
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Public sector, Local government, Healthcare Healthcare, Retail, Financial services
Best use cases A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced., A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. A company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate., A retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme.
Typical project type Fixed project Dedicated team

Made Tech vs Itransition: pros and cons

Made Tech
+ Deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks
+ Public reporting makes financial health easy to check
+ A growing backlog points to sustained repeat business from government
- Little private-sector experience, so commercial buyers have better options
- No offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates
- Contractor reliance roughly doubled in FY25
Itransition
+ Among the lowest rates for a vendor of this size
+ Covers CRM platforms such as Salesforce and Dynamics as well as custom builds
+ Large team for staffing flexibility
- Thin evidence of UK-based delivery or account leadership
- Corporate location data is inconsistent between sources
- Historical Belarus base may raise questions with some UK procurement teams

Who should choose Made Tech?

A typical fit: a council wants legacy case-management systems replaced.

Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Local government, Healthcare.

Who should choose Itransition?

A typical fit: a company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate.

Low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail, Financial services, Logistics.

Decision matrix: Made Tech vs Itransition

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Made Tech
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Itransition
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Made Tech (Not published) vs Itransition (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Itransition
You want engineers added to your own in-house team Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams
Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices Neither; consider an embedded specialist

Use case fit: Made Tech vs Itransition

Use case Made Tech fit Itransition fit Winner
A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced. Strong Limited Made Tech
A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. Strong Limited Made Tech
A company needs Salesforce customisation at a low rate. Limited Strong Itransition
A retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. Limited Strong Itransition
You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract Limited Limited Both equally
You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement Strong Strong Both equally

Verdict: Made Tech vs Itransition

Made Tech (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog.

Itransition (3.8/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a retailer wants testing capacity for a release programme. If your situation matches that, Itransition is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Made Tech vs Itransition FAQ

Is Made Tech better than Itransition?

Made Tech (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Made Tech's strongest advantage: deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks. Itransition's strongest advantage: among the lowest rates for a vendor of this size.

How do Made Tech and Itransition differ in pricing?

Made Tech uses framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Itransition uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Made Tech or Itransition?

Made Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Made Tech and Itransition?

Made Tech's primary differentiator is: public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Itransition's primary differentiator is: low rates across a wide catalogue of development and platform services. They also differ in team size (400–500 vs 3,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Local government vs Healthcare, Retail).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.