Made Tech vs Sigma Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Made Tech (4.1/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software (4.0/5) overall. Made Tech is the better choice for UK central and local government buyers. Sigma Software is the stronger option for broad-scope outsourcing, Scandinavian-owned vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Made Tech vs Sigma Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Made Tech | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2008 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Stockholm, Sweden and Kyiv, Ukraine (UK presence) |
| Team size | 400–500 | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog | Swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering |
| Pricing model | Framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Ruby, Python, Java | Java, .NET, C++ |
| Industries served | Public sector, Local government, Healthcare | Automotive, Telecoms, Financial services, Media, Healthcare |
Made Tech vs Sigma Software: overview
Made Tech
Made Tech was founded in London in 2008 and listed on AIM in 2021. FY25 revenue (to May 2025) rose 20% to £46.4m with a contracted backlog of £92.2m, and the company reported around 430 employees after a period of hiring. Almost all of its work is for UK central and local government, health and other regulated bodies. Contractor use rose to 19% of the workforce in FY25, and management has said it plans to bring that back toward 10%.
Sigma Software
Sigma Software was founded in 2002 and belongs to the Swedish Sigma group. It describes a team of over 2,100 professionals in 40 offices across 19 countries, with most engineering in Ukraine and Poland. Directories list it inconsistently as UK-based or Stockholm-based, which reflects its mix of Swedish ownership and international offices. It covers a broad range of services and industries.
Services and capabilities: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
| Capability | Made Tech | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
| Framework / platform | Made Tech | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
| Criterion | Made Tech | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
| Dimension | Made Tech | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Public sector, Local government, Healthcare | Automotive, Telecoms, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced., A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. | A telecoms firm needs network software engineers., An automotive supplier wants embedded developers. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Made Tech vs Sigma Software: pros and cons
| Made Tech | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks |
| + | Public reporting makes financial health easy to check |
| + | A growing backlog points to sustained repeat business from government |
| - | Little private-sector experience, so commercial buyers have better options |
| - | No offshore delivery, so rates are UK onshore rates |
| - | Contractor reliance roughly doubled in FY25 |
| Sigma Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Swedish parent adds governance and financial backing |
| + | Broad technical range, including embedded and automotive |
| + | Ukrainian and Polish rates |
| - | UK office details are hard to confirm from public sources |
| - | Breadth means less obvious specialism in any one area |
Who should choose Made Tech?
A typical fit: a council wants legacy case-management systems replaced.
Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Local government, Healthcare.
Who should choose Sigma Software?
A typical fit: a telecoms firm needs network software engineers.
Swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecoms, Financial services, Media, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Made Tech |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sigma Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Made Tech (Not published) vs Sigma Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sigma Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Sigma Software |
Use case fit: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
| Use case | Made Tech fit | Sigma Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A council wants legacy case-management systems replaced. | Strong | Limited | Made Tech |
| A government department needs a discovery and alpha phase for a new service. | Strong | Limited | Made Tech |
| A telecoms firm needs network software engineers. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| An automotive supplier wants embedded developers. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Made Tech vs Sigma Software
Made Tech (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog.
Sigma Software (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an automotive supplier wants embedded developers. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Made Tech vs Sigma Software FAQ
Is Made Tech better than Sigma Software?
Made Tech (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Made Tech's strongest advantage: deep familiarity with GDS service standards and government frameworks. Sigma Software's strongest advantage: swedish parent adds governance and financial backing.
How do Made Tech and Sigma Software differ in pricing?
Made Tech uses framework call-offs, time and materials, fixed price pricing. Sigma Software uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Made Tech or Sigma Software?
Made Tech is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Made Tech and Sigma Software?
Made Tech's primary differentiator is: public-sector-only focus with a growing contracted backlog. Sigma Software's primary differentiator is: swedish group ownership with Ukrainian and Polish engineering. They also differ in team size (400–500 vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Local government vs Automotive, Telecoms).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.