Spyrosoft vs Infinum: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) edges ahead of Infinum (4.1/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for automotive and industrial software, UK-led Polish teams. Infinum is the stronger option for consumer apps where design quality matters. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs Infinum: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2005 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland (UK office in Dorset) | Zagreb, Croatia (London office) |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 350–450 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business | In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C++, Java, .NET | Swift, Kotlin, Flutter |
| Industries served | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare | Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail |
Spyrosoft vs Infinum: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was set up in 2016 by a group that included UK-based co-founder Andrew Radcliffe, and its UK entity actually came before its first Polish office. It is headquartered in Wrocław and has grown quickly, with figures ranging from around 800 to 1,900 staff depending on the source. Spyrosoft Ltd runs UK operations from Dorset, with delivery mostly in Poland. Automotive, embedded and industrial software are notable strengths next to standard web and cloud work.
Infinum
Infinum was founded in Zagreb, Croatia in 2005 and employs around 400 people across Zagreb, Varaždin, Ljubljana, Podgorica, Amsterdam, New York and London. Its London office opened in 2021. The company is best known for polished mobile and web products, with design and engineering kept under one roof. Croatian rates sit below the UK but above the cheapest Eastern European options.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
| Capability | Spyrosoft | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile app development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data & AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Legacy modernisation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded & IoT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | Infinum |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing | Financial services, Media, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers., A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built., A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Spyrosoft vs Infinum: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire |
| + | Embedded and automotive work adds range for hardware-adjacent projects |
| + | Listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, so financial results are public |
| - | Rapid growth through hiring and acquisitions can mean uneven maturity between business units |
| - | The UK office is small; nearly all engineers are in Poland |
| Infinum | |
|---|---|
| + | Design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products |
| + | EU-based delivery simplifies GDPR-related contract terms |
| + | A London office lets UK clients meet the team in person |
| - | Better suited to product builds than large enterprise back-office systems |
| - | Smaller than most nearshore vendors on this list, which limits team growth |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers.
Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Financial services, Manufacturing, Healthcare.
Who should choose Infinum?
A typical fit: a bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built.
In-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Media, Healthcare, Retail.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Spyrosoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not published) vs Infinum (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spyrosoft |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| Your product includes hardware, firmware or connected devices | Spyrosoft |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | Infinum fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An automotive supplier needs infotainment or vehicle software engineers. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A UK industrial company needs embedded and cloud developers for a monitoring product. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A bank wants a new retail banking app designed and built. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| A media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. | Limited | Strong | Infinum |
| You need hardware, firmware or IoT work in the same contract | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs Infinum
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Development Outsourcing projects. Polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business.
Infinum (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a media brand needs iOS and Android apps with a shared design system. If your situation matches that, Infinum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs Infinum FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than Infinum?
Spyrosoft (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: UK leadership is part of the founding team rather than a later sales hire. Infinum's strongest advantage: design and engineering work as one team, which helps consumer-facing products.
How do Spyrosoft and Infinum differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Infinum uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or Infinum?
Infinum is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and Infinum?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish engineering capacity with a UK co-founder running the UK business. Infinum's primary differentiator is: in-house product design and mobile engineering with a strong portfolio of consumer apps. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 350–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Financial services vs Financial services, Media).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.